Friday, August 31, 2018

Lesson 1-3: Ordered Pairs as Points (Day 13)

Today on her Mathematics Calendar 2018, Theoni Pappas writes:

Find the measure of an angle whose complement is 28 degrees more than the measure of the angle.

Let the angle have measure x. Its complement must have measure 90 - x. But from the given information, the complement equals x + 28. Thus:

x + 28 = 90 - x
2x = 62
x = 31

Therefore the measure of the angle is 31 degrees -- and of course, today's date is the 31st. This problem can be given as early as Lesson 3-2 in the U of Chicago text, since this is the lesson that introduces complements of angles.

This is what I wrote last year about today's lesson:

Lesson 1-3 of the U of Chicago text is called "Ordered Pairs as Points." (It appears as Lesson 1-2 in the modern edition of the text.) The main focus of the lesson is graphing points on the plane. Indeed, we have another description of a point:

Third description of a point:
A point is an ordered pair of numbers.

The idea of graphing points on a coordinate plane is a familiar one. But sometimes I wonder whether we should make students graph points and lines so soon in their Geometry course.

Once again, here's how I think about it -- the students coming to us just finished Algebra I. Some of them struggled just to earn a grade of C- or D- (whatever the lowest allowable Algebra I grade is in your district is so that the students can advance to Geometry). The students who just barely passed Algebra I are tired of seeing algebra. They may look forward to Geometry where they won't have to see so much algebra -- and then one of the first things we show them is more algebra.

Then there's also the issue, first brought up by David Joyce, that students should use similarity to show why the graph of a linear equation is a line. This idea appears in the Common Core standards for eighth grade, but it's awkward in high school. Graphing linear equations is a first semester Algebra I topic while similarity is a second semester Geometry topic -- and it's difficult to justify delaying graphing linear equations by three semesters just to conform to Joyce's wishes.

In the past, I've tried -- and failed -- to teach linear graphs after similarity. (This includes last year, when I tried to follow the eighth grade standards, but I left the class before graphing equations.) This year, my plan is simple -- I will conform to the order of the U of Chicago text. The U of Chicago text introduces linear graphs in Lesson 1-3, and so that's when I'm teaching it.

The bonus question asks about longitude and latitude. I've already located my own coordinates as being near 34N, 118W.

Here is the Blaugust prompt for today:

Letter to my first-year teacher self…

I choose this prompt because it's the 31st prompt on Shelli's list, and today's date is the 31st. But it's only fitting that this falls on the final day of the month, since a letter to my first-year self is exactly what I need to tie up everything that I've written in the previous Blaugust posts.

When Shelli first included this prompt in the list, she probably intended the letters to say something like, "I know teaching is tough now, but it'll become easier after a few years." But obviously, that's not what I want to write. My first year of teaching was by any stretch of the imagination a failure, and so what I need to write myself is information that would have made myself a better teacher.

The sender of this letter is my current self. The recipient of this letter is myself on the day before my very first day of teaching -- August 15th, 2016. This letter will contain a few links, but I'll be careful to link only to pages that existed before August 15th, 2016.

From: David Walker, August 31st, 2018
To: David Walker, August 15th, 2016

Dear Past Self,

This letter serves a warning from two years in the future. Tomorrow is the first day of school, and I know that the hard work will begin. Unless I heed this warning, I won't complete this first year of teaching and only make it to the Long March.

Section 1: Classroom Management

I'm aware coming in to the year that classroom management is not a strength -- and the main reason that it isn't a strength is because I lack a strong teacher tone. But I can be successful this year if I make up for the lack of teacher tone with a teacher look. The old poem goes:

No more pencils, no more books,
No more teachers' dirty looks!

So just as pencils and books are essential in the classroom, so is teacher look -- especially to someone like me who lacks teacher tone. I know that I don't have teacher tone, but I've never really tried out teacher look. I must remember the Fred Jones book, where the author refers to teacher look as the Queen Victoria look. Teacher look is the first step to becoming a good classroom manager this year.

Here are some common student sayings and how I should respond to them:

Student: I wasn't talking!
Teacher: (teacher look)

Student: I still wasn't talking!
Teacher: (say student's name, followed by teacher look)

Student: He/she really wasn't talking!
Teacher: (ignore, not even a teacher look)

Student: I'm not chewing gum! (hides gum under tongue, shows empty mouth)
Teacher: Stop hiding it under your tongue and spit it out. (plus teacher look)

Student: I'm not chewing gum! This is really paper in my mouth.
Teacher: Spit it out. You're not allowed to chew paper either. (plus teacher look)

Student: I'm eating in class because I'm hungry.
Teacher: Tough! No food in class. (plus teacher look)

Student: I'm not using a cell phone. This is really an empty phone case.
Teacher: Put it away. You're not allowed to have a phone case out either. (plus teacher look)

Student: You're the only teacher who enforces this rule.
Teacher: Tough! (plus teacher look)

Student: We act this bad in every class.
Teacher: (teacher look)

Student: Why?
Teacher: Because I said so!

When in doubt, just use teacher look.

I am a teacher. Sometimes I'll have to make unpopular decisions. I'll catch someone breaking a rule and not only will be rule breaker tell me that I'm wrong to enforce the rule, but all of the surrounding students will tell me that I'm wrong. But I must enforce the rule anyway. There might be some students who, deep down, know that I'm correct to enforce a rule, but won't say anything out of fear of being labeled a "snitch." Most of the time, no one will say anything. If I wanted to be applauded for my decisions, I should have become an entertainer, not a teacher.

Many times students will say that I am "unfair" or "mean" to enforce a rule. But I should go ahead and enforce the rule anyway. I'd much rather have every single student in class hate me for enforcing rules than have even one student like me because I let him/her get away with breaking rules.

I remember the week I subbed in a middle school class three months ago (May 2016) when one girl was bullied by other students. I expect bullying to be common here, and must stop it if I see it. The victim will probably say nothing, yet deep down will be grateful when I enforce the rules here.

I should not rely on deducting participation points as a punishment. This is because many smart students misbehave (sometimes like myself as a young student), so they rack up points for getting right answers, and then their points never become negative when they misbehave. If there are to be participation points at all, I should start each student at zero and only add, not deduct points.

Students should earn a short detention (nutrition, lunch, after school) if they repeatedly fail to follow my directions. The detention should double if they fail to serve it.

I never again want to be in a situation where I'm afraid to tell students to do something because I'm certain that they won't do it. I should emphatically tell the students to do it and be prepared to punish them if they don't.

Every time students stand up and leave their seat, I should ask them what they are doing. Even if they are merely sharpening a pencil, I should force them to declare it anyway.

One of my rules should be "Follow all adult directions the first time they are given." On the other hand, the so-called rule I blogged about, "respect order," is not a valid rule. Students respect order in class only when they respect the teacher and fear the teacher's punishment. Therefore "respect order" is a thinly disguised way of saying "respect the teacher."

In his book, Harry Wong stresses the importance of procedures. Some activities are obviously procedures (such as taking out and putting away laptops), but almost every activity can be considered a procedure (such as Warm-Up and Exit Pass). Students may complain that they have to follow these procedures at first, but I must enforce the procedures anyway. Chances are that once I enforce each procedure ten times, the students will stop complaining about it.

As for the laptop procedure, I'm currently considering labeling the laptop slots with numbers. I must not go home today (August 15th, 2016) until the slots have been numbered.

I remember subbing at middle schools in my old district where some teachers came up with the call and response, "Class Class? Yes Yes!" By the end of the first week, I should establish a similar call and response procedure and enforce it. This means that if I ask the class to be quiet and even one student is still talking, I stop and use teacher look. Otherwise, more than one student will start talking and the call and response procedure is never enforced. Until I come up with such a procedure, I should use teacher look when students talk out of turn.

As the school year is about to begin, I start wondering whether my student support aide is a good classroom manager or not. As it happens, she's excellent at classroom management -- and unless I heed this warning, the students will listen to her, not me. My having the rank of "teacher" isn't enough to prevent yet another situation where students listen to everyone in class except me. She is destined to become the new teacher of this class by next year unless I change my habits.

Many of the things I say in this letter reflect what my mentors have told me before -- most notably my master teacher from when I was student teaching. My mentors never explicitly tell me to do anything I mention in this letter, because classroom management comes naturally to them, and they do all of this without thinking. Since I'm not a natural classroom manager, I use deliberately choose to follow the actions suggested in this letter.

Section 2: Avoiding Yelling and Arguments

Because I lack a true teacher tone, whenever I raise my voice it turns into a yell. My goal should be to avoid yelling at all costs.

Often when I feel the urge to yell, it's because students are misbehaving and have convinced me that it's wrong to punish them. Instead of yelling at them, I should punish them.

Arguments often lead to yelling. Therefore, I should try to avoid arguments. There are certain things I often say that lead to arguments, so I shouldn't say them. Examples include:

"Because you're more likely to get an A."
Many students don't care about getting high grades in math or any other subject as much as I did as a young student. Often, students behave not because they want an A, but because they respect the teacher and fear punishment. Therefore I should be trying to get students to respect me and be aware that they will be punished. I might want to say this in response to a "Why?" question. My answer should be "Because I said so," not "Because you're more likely to get an A." But the chant "What grade do you want to earn? An A!" at the start of a quiz or test is a good idea.

"Because you should attend every single second of class."
Many students don't care about perfect attendance as much as I did as a young student. Often, students attend class not because they care about attendance, but because they respect the teacher and fear punishment. Therefore I should be trying to get students to respect me and be aware that they will be punished. I might want to say this in response to a question "Why can't I use the restroom or go to the drinking fountain during class?"

Last month (July 2016), I read a magazine article about a tomb guard who works around the clock without rest. I should not even mention this in class as a reason not to let students go to the restroom.

The idea of handing out restroom passes at the start of the trimester is sound, but many students whom I'm sure have passes have often lost them when they need to go. I know that I'm trying to avoid keeping track of two things (participation points and restroom passes), but there's no real way around it. I must keep track of the passes rather than expect students not to lose them.

I can either go the traditional "three passes at the start of the trimester" route for everyone or, if I don't mind keeping track, let the students earn passes for A's.

Music break is a great idea. But students should still need a pass if they leave during music break. I should get the class quiet so that students are either listening to me or singing along during break.

The idea that a student who doesn't know basic math is a "dren" is sound. But some special ed students might be offended by the concept, and this might lead to arguments. I should emphasize that a "dren" is someone too lazy to do basic math.

Either today or tomorrow (August 15th-16th, 2016), I'll receive an email from the administration that students in sixth grade and above must have uniforms on the first day of school -- the grace period is only for fifth and below. But this will lead to arguments if I try to enforce it. The email will come from the sister campus, where perhaps all middle school students have uniforms. But at our campus, some students just barely enrolled last week. I should only enforce the uniforms if the other middle school teachers are actively enforcing them. Instead, I must focus more on enforcing classroom rules.

I should enforce the no cell phone rule only in my own classroom, rather than outside. In particular, I shouldn't worry about cell phones used during P.E. at the end of the day or on field trips. Only experienced teachers are respected enough by students to enforce rules outside. I should only enforce no cell phones if the other middle school teachers are actively enforcing it (that is, by actually walking up and down during P.E. and confiscating phones). Instead, I must focus more on enforcing my classroom rules.

In fact, during P.E. time it's a good idea to hang out with the other middle school teachers and discuss our respective days.

To avoid arguments, it's okay to relax certain rules with special ed students when appropriate. In a month or two I'll finally see IEP's for special ed students. But there are some commonsense things that I can do to help special ed students even without an IEP.

To avoid arguments, it's okay to talk occasionally with students about something other than math. If I have stronger classroom management, I will feel more confident that I can have a short conversation without losing control of the class.

To avoid arguments, I should be more careful about markers. The STAPLES store sells small boxes of a dozen markers, so I should look for these. I can purchase a new box of these markers each time that a whiteboard lesson is scheduled. Then the larger markers can be reserved for teacher use on the front whiteboard.

If I tell students to do something and they don't, I should repeat the request. Then I should say "Third Time!" and repeat the request. Then I should say "Fourth Time!" and repeat the request. If by then they still refuse to do it, I should punish them. If the students comply, then thank them. The word "Finally!" should not be part of my vocabulary at this point.

When in doubt, if I feel the urge to yell and don't know what to do instead, just use teacher look.

Section 3: Avoiding Mention of Past Incidents

Sometimes, a student will ask "Why do I have to follow this rule?" Often, my answer will be something like, "To avoid (past incident) from occurring again." This isn't a good response. Instead, it's always better to answer "Because I said so."

Sometimes, a student will claim "It's impossible to follow this rule." Often, my answer will be something like, "I was able to follow it as a young student." This isn't a good response, since usually the student will counter with "That's you, not me."

Students often say "That's impossible!" when they mean "That's difficult!" or "I don't want to." I should enforce the rules even if they claim that they're impossible to follow. They'll suddenly realize that the rules are possible to follow once they see that I'll punish them unless they follow the rules.

It might seem better to say, "The other class was able to follow rules," instead of "I was able to follow rules," but it's not. The student will counter with "That's them, not me." Indeed, I should never compare my current class to either myself or another class unless it's a favorable comparison.

If a student says, "Prove that I was talking," nothing I say or do will ever be accepted as a valid proof by that student. Instead, I should give teacher look. The idea is for "Prove it!" to disappear. If I show strong classroom management from the start, "Prove it!" will never appear.

Section 4: Faster Warm-Ups

The Illinois State text contains a Five-Minute Daily Assessment. Therefore Pappas-based questions where the answer is the date should become the Exit Pass, not the Warm-Up.

The Daily Assessment should take only five minutes. At first, students will complain that I'm not giving enough time unless I establish a procedure. At first, I should give warnings such as "Four minutes to go," "Three minutes to go," and so on. I should encourage students who haven't started working that time is running out. I should gradually give fewer minute warnings, perhaps giving only "One minute to go." In a few weeks, I should be able to dispense with all minute warnings, since students will have learned the Warm-Up procedure.

For the Exit Pass, at some point most of the students will catch on that the answer is the date and just write an answer with no work. I should not give these students credit unless they show work, even if it means denying credit to more than half the students. I should make sure to warn the students that they won't get credit unless they show the work.

In fact, the plan for tomorrow, the first day of school, should be the reverse of my original plan:

  • Warm-Up: "If you don't know the answer, at least know..."
  • Name Tents
  • Music Break: The Dren Song
  • Bridge Problem
  • Exit Pass: 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 = ?
Here I also replace Dan Meyer's "Personality Coordinates" with Sara VanDerWerf's Name Tents:


I was torn between whether to give "Good Luck" notes once at the end of the year, or once at the end of each trimester. I shouldn't wait until the end of the year or even the end of the trimester to connect to my students. Instead, VanDerWerf name tents allow me to connect to students from the start. While Personality Coordinates allow the students to connect to each other, Name Tents allow the teacher to connect to the students.

Section 5: Student Engagement

I never want to be in a situation hardly any student knows how to solve a problem, especially when it's a review lesson. By giving up and solving the problem myself, I'm saying that "math is just hard," which makes me no better off than the students.

Regardless of how difficult a lesson is, there should be at least a few students who can solve the problem by the time of the review. If no one can solve a problem, it means that either I didn't teach the lesson properly, or else my classroom management is so weak that students can just talk through the lesson without consequences.

If someone had told me that I would have an hour of computer time at the end of the day, and there is neither a grade for the class nor any other accountability, I would have called that person crazy, since of course the students won't do the work. Yet that's exactly what's in my current plans.

Instead, there should be an IXL accountability form. This is a form that is similar to the Warm-Up form in that it contains blank spaces for students to complete approximately ten questions. Every students gets an IXL form. Since there aren't enough laptops for the students, the students with laptops can use the IXL form as scratch paper, and I record their IXL score (0-100) on the form. The students without laptops must answer ten questions that I come up with myself (but similar to the IXL questions for the day). All ten answers must be correct, or otherwise the students must continue to redo them until they are all correct.

At the end of the day, I collect the IXL forms. The students who earn at least 70 on  IXL or answer all ten written questions earn a participation point. Those who earn a perfect 100 on IXL earn a second participation point. Those who fail to reach 70 on IXL or answer ten written questions earn no points, and continued failure to reach 70 or ten results in consequences, including talking to the student as the others go out to P.E. class.

When in doubt, I should have more accountability worksheets, not fewer. It's a good idea to create worksheets for other tasks such as Illinois State projects. Yes, I fear that the copy machine will break down and so I don't want to become dependent on the copier. As for what I should do when the copier breaks down, I should cross that bridge when I reach it. Only classroom managers stronger than I should attempt to teach a class without worksheets.

I should post IXL and other passwords on the wall so that students can look up their passwords themselves rather than ask me for them over and over.

Section 6: Illinois State Implementation

Many members of the MTBoS integrate projects throughout their lessons. While these aren't the same as the "bells and whistles" of the Illinois State text, those teachers would agree that the different components of their own respective lessons can be helpful to weaker students. Therefore I owe it to the students to implement all parts of the curriculum. I will be judged by whether I implement all parts of the curriculum, including the trickier parts such as DIDAX manipulatives and die cuts.

I know that pacing guide on the Illinois State website is difficult to decipher, but I should spend more time analyzing it. The lessons are listed there in Common Core order, which is the same order as the "traditional textbook." This means that both sixth and seventh grade lessons start with all of the RP lessons, then NS and EE, and so on.

I know that I'm fond of the order of the lessons in the eighth grade STEM text, Despite this, I should follow the order of the pacing guide and start with NS and EE.

Here are possible lesson plans for the first few weeks of school:


  • Tuesday, August 16th: Name Tents, Bridge Activity (reverse order from original plans)
  • Wednesday, August 17th: Rule Posters
  • Thursday, August 18th: Building Activity
  • Friday, August 19th: Number Patterns (reverse Thursday/Friday from original plans)
  • Mon.-Wed., August 22nd-24th: Math Benchmark Tests
  • Thursday, August 25th: Science Benchmark Tests
  • Friday, August 26th: Fraction Fever Activity
  • Monday, August 29th: Coding Monday
  • Tuesday, August 30th: Traditional Textbook (6th-7th -- RP1, 8th: NS1)
  • Wednesday, August 31st: Learning Centers
  • Thursday, September 1st: Mousetrap Car STEM Project
  • Fri.-Mon., September 2nd-5th: Holiday
  • Tuesday, September 6th: Traditional Textbook (6th-7th -- RP2, 8th: NS2)
  • Wednesday, September 7th: Learning Centers
  • Thursday, September 8th: STEM Project
  • Friday, September 9th: Interactive Focus Tutorial, Weekly Assessment (on RP1 and NS1)


Then the pattern continues with coding on Mondays, Traditional Textbook on Tuesdays, Learning Centers on Wednesdays, STEM Projects on Thursdays, and Weekly Assessment on Fridays.

For Learning Centers, divide the class into groups. One group can work on extra problems in the book, one group can use DIDAX manipulatives, and one group can use die cuts.

The Illinois State text doesn't provide many die cut lessons for middle school. One of the few that appears is the square root activity demonstrated to me last week. This lesson fits eighth grade NS2, and so it's perfect for September 7th Learning Centers.

When submitting lesson plans to the administrators, I should provide an extra copy of the lesson plans to my student support aide. She's a professional who deserves to know my lesson plans. If I lift the burden of classroom management from her shoulders, then she might be willing to help me out, especially with Learning Centers and finding materials for the STEM Projects. I should try to submit the plans as early as possible. It shouldn't take much work on my part, since the basic framework for every week is the same. All I have to do is change the Common Core standard.

I am required to give the online Illinois State homework. As usual, I should print it out and pass it out to the students. Those who complete it online can indicate so on the worksheet and turn it in, leaving the questions blank. Others can choose to answer the questions directly on the worksheet. I should pass out homework at the start of the week and collect it at the end of the week.

The homework should trail the traditional lessons by one week. Thus during the week of September 6th, I assign RP1 and NS1 in class as the students learn RP2 and NS2 in class. The assessment at the end of the week should be on what the students did for homework. The Interactive Focus Tutorial counts as review for the assessment. It can be completed on whiteboards.

Ordinarily the weekly assessment for RP2 and NS2 should be September 16th, except this is the day of the LA County Fair field trip. I should plan my itinerary for the field trip in advance rather than walk around aimlessly with the students. In particular, we should board a tram and head out to the farm area as soon as possible.

Section 7: Online SBAC Review

The SBAC is an online test. I should be familiar with the SBAC website and what the test looks like for students, especially in the weeks leading up to the test.

http://www.caaspp.org/

I admit that the SBAC website is difficult to work with, which explains why my blog posts from three months ago (May 2016) were on PARCC review, not the SBAC. But I owe it to my students to be familiar with the SBAC website. I will be judged on how well my students are prepared to take the SBAC test online.

The multiple-choice portion of the SBAC math test is divided into two sections. The first section is non-calculator while the second is calculator. I should be familiar with how to access the calculator in the second section. I should not attempt to access the calculator in the first section.

I was shocked to find out last week that I had to teach science in addition to math. I am already aware of the transition to NGSS Standards. I should have performed a Google search for ngss site:lausd.net the instant I found out that I had to teach science. This will link to a description of how the LAUSD is making the transition. I should also check out the SBAC website to find out as much information as possible about the new California Science Test for eighth graders.

I misinterpreted administrators last week. They never said that I didn't have to teach science. What they really said was that our sister charter would get the Illinois State science textbooks. Instead, I should access the texts online. My teachers editions of the science texts will arrive in a few months.

The old test covered only eighth grade physical science, but the new test covers all three grades of middle school science. Therefore I should teach science to all three grades. I can use the LAUSD website to determine what science to teach each grade. Most likely, eighth graders get physical science and seventh graders life science, but sixth graders get the new integrated NGSS science.

I feared that teaching science would make me feel as if I have six preps. To make it easier, I can replace the Thursday STEM projects for math with science projects from the online text. It's very important to type my own worksheets for these since the students don't have copies of the text (and the Illinois State website won't let me print them). This is, in fact, exactly what my counterpart at the sister charter is doing. She is only giving the science projects, not the math projects.

In fact, from the very start of the year, I establish Thursday as science day. The first Thursday of the year is the building project, since it's a science-like opening activity. The second Thursday of the week is a science Benchmark Test. I won't be given a specific science benchmark, so instead I can make it up. Study Island provides a bank of questions as a pretest.

Yes, it's a good idea to use the eighth grade Study Island block on Wednesdays for science. This is something that I shouldn't print. Instead, let them read the articles and answer the questions online.

Ironically, the Illinois State website actually provides arts projects for science. So I can use these as part of Wednesday Learning Centers.

Otherwise, all science is on Thursdays. It's a good idea to have the students take notes in a notebook for science, which they can optionally use for math as well. If I fear that some students will go the whole year without ever buying a notebook, then I can provide the first one for them. There should currently be a sale at the Staples store where each notebook costs only a quarter. There is a limit of five notebooks, but my classes are small enough that by even purchasing five per day starting today, I can buy one notebook for every student by the third week of school and the first real science lesson.

It might be tricky to schedule the science lessons. A four-week rotation might work:


  • Week 1: Science Project
  • Week 2: Traditional Lesson (in notebooks)
  • Week 3: Science Project
  • Week 4: Science Assessment


One project every two weeks fits the requirement that we submit photos of a project to Illinois State every other week.

If I fear that I won't be able to keep up with having three different science projects in the three grades each week, then I can start with the mousetrap car project from the math STEM text in all three grades the first week. Once I get accustomed to giving science projects, then I can start assigning appropriate science projects in each grade.

The idea of dren quizzes is great, but I'm not quite sure where they fit in this scheme. Ironically, they might actually fit on Thursdays before the science lesson. Only one dren quiz per four-week cycle is truly needed to cover the 10's and 2's through 9's. The original three-week cycle that I'd imagined doesn't fit with Illinois State. And besides, I'll have a student support aide to help me grade tests, so there's not really a need to stagger the assessments.

I know teaching is tough now, but it'll become easier after a few years. In particular, even though there will still be a single math/science next year, two years from now there will finally be separate teachers for math and science at my school. But the only way that I can make it to my third year to be that math teacher is to follow the instructions in this letter.

Sincerely,

David Walker, August 31st, 2018

Notice that the seven sections of this letter fit the seven New Year's resolutions. I'll be back in the classroom subbing next week. I can't really send this letter to my first-year teacher self, but I can keep these instructions to myself in mind in the classroom next week -- especially the instructions that are related to classroom management. (Obviously, the ones mentioning the Illinois State text, etc., won't be applicable.)

As Blaugust comes to a close, today we revisit the blog of Cheryl Leung:

https://matheasyaspi.wordpress.com/2018/09/01/reflections-on-my-mtbosblaugust/

(The post is dated September 1st, but due to time zones it was visible to me today, August 31st.) In this post Leung reflects on her participation in the Blaugust challenge.

Here's one of my favorite Leung posts from this month:

https://matheasyaspi.wordpress.com/2018/08/07/be-kind-and-be-brave-classroom-display/

In Leung's sixth grade class she has only two rules -- "Be Kind" and "Be Brave." In many ways, "Be Kind" and "Be Brave" are similar to my "Respect Order" -- they sounds nice, but how do those rules actually play out in the classroom?

But I'm sure that if her sixth graders started misbehaving the way my own sixth graders did during the year I taught them, Leung would have been quick to restore order. "Be Kind" and "Be Brave" are thrown out the window when the class gets out of control.

In fact, notice the background of the photo that Leung includes in this post:


  • Complete Silence -- No Talking
  • Group Conversations -- Table Group Hears
  • Whole-Class Discussion

Those are the actual rules in her classroom -- actually, they're more like procedures. No sixth grader in her class can play the same sophistry that my own sixth graders use. When the sign is set to "Complete Silence," here's what won't happen in her class:

Teacher: Young man, no talking!
Student: But I was "being kind" to my friends by talking to them.
Teacher: Young lady, no talking!
Student: But I was "being brave" by talking to someone new.

No, if Leung's sixth graders try to pull that trick, she'll punish them harshly. I need my class to be more like Leung's if I'm to be a successful teacher.

In the end, I agree with Leung when she writes:

As I look back on the month of August, I never would have imagined that I would write so much this month.   Some of it was more reflective  and some less so, but I am better for having taken the time to think in ways that I would not have done without this challenge.   So, many thanks to @druinok [aka Shelli -- dw].



Thursday, August 30, 2018

Lesson 1-2: Locations as Points (Day 12)

This is what I wrote last year about today's lesson:

Lesson 1-2 of the U of Chicago text is called "Locations as Points." (It appears as Lesson 1-1 in the modern edition of the text.) The main focus of the lesson is graphing points on a number line. Indeed, we have another description of a point:

Second Description of a Point:
A point is an exact location.

Yesterday I made a big deal about the first description of a point -- the dot -- since many of our students are interested in pixel-based technology. Locations as points aren't as exciting -- but still, the second description is something we think about every time we find a distance. The definition of distance is highlighted in the text:

Definition:
The distance between two points on a coordinatized line is the absolute value of the difference of their coordinates.

Other than this, the lesson is straightforward. Students learn about zero- through three-dimensional figures, but of course the emphasis is on one dimension. One of the two "exploration questions," which I included as a bonus, is:

-- Physicists sometimes speak of space-time. How many dimensions does space-time have?

The answer, of course, is four -- even though there might be as many as ten dimensions in string theory. We ordinarily only include Einstein's four dimensions and don't consider the extra six dimensions of string theory as part of "space-time."

Here's the other bonus question:

-- To the nearest 100 miles, how far do you live from each of the following cities?
a. New York
b. Los Angeles
c. Honolulu
d. Moscow

Well, part b is easy -- I worked in L.A. last year and my daily commute obviously wasn't anywhere near 100 miles, so my distance to L.A. is 0 miles to the nearest 100 miles. The U of Chicago text gives the distance from L.A. to New York as 2451 miles as the crow flies, but 2786 miles by car. I choose to give the air distance in part a, in order to be consistent with parts c and d (for which only air distance is available). We round it up to 2500 miles. My answers are:

a. 2500 miles
b. 0 miles
c. 2600 miles
d. 6100 miles

Hmmm, that's interesting -- I'm only slightly closer to New York than to Honolulu.

Here is the Blaugust prompt for today:

A Day in the LIfe  (#DITL)

After yesterday's "An Hour (or 75-80 minutes) in the Life" and "A Week in the Life," we've finally see a format very familiar to us, "A Day in the Life." During my year of teaching, I wrote several "Day in the Life" posts for another challenge led by Tina Cardone. And I'll be continuing to write "Day in the Life" posts once again once subbing starts up again, which should be next week.

For today's Blaugust post I'll reblog one of the "Day of the Life" posts from the Cardone year. I want to choose an ordinary day, not one of Cardone's special days (first day of something, last day of something, and so on). And too many of my Cardone posts landed on weekends, holidays, or field trip days. Therefore I choose to quote the "Day in the Life" from October 18th, 2016:

7:45 -- I arrive at my school.

8:00 -- I report to the playground, where many students are beginning to arrive. The students are told to gather in a circle for the flag salute.

8:25 -- My first class, a sixth grade class, begins.

8:45 -- The dean comes in and announces the start of the CELDT test -- the California English Language Development Test. All students classified as English Learners -- which about a third of the class -- go downstairs to take the test.

9:45 -- My sixth graders leave and my seventh graders arrive. Many of these students are still out taking the CELDT test.

11:05 -- My seventh graders leave for nutrition.

11:25 -- My eighth grade class arrives. I begin the class the same way I start all my classes, with a Warm-Up question:

Question: (x^3)^6 = x^?

The answer is 18 -- and of course today is the 18th.

11:35 -- Today is the second day of the project we've been working on. It is called "Learning to Communicate," and it is the fourth project of the Illinois State text. (I explained how the Illinois State text is project-based back in my August PD post.) The first four projects are the same for all three grades, and so this is the third time today that I'm giving this project. It was tricky, though, since many of the students are out for the CELDT. There are no eighth graders taking the test -- this class is just a smaller class anyway.

The project requires students to draw various 3D figures on two types of graph paper. The first part, given last Friday, was on oblique graph paper. Today we use isometric paper. I found the isometric paper using Google -- here is the first link:

https://www.printablepaper.net/category/isometric_graph

Notice that the words "isometric" and "isometry" -- as in Common Core Geometry transformation -- are definitely related. Both mean "equal length" -- an isometry maps segments to segments of equal length, and on isometric paper, the sides of the cube are all the same length on the paper.

But some students struggled to draw a cube on the oblique paper on Friday, and so today I've already drawn some cubes and other figures on the isometric paper so students can just copy it. Yet many of the students still have trouble with it. They either try to draw an oblique cube on the isometric paper or merely draw a square.

I think back to the activity I gave back on the third day of school (which I mentioned back in my monthly post for August). I found the activity in another textbook, in a lesson called "Drawing in Perspective," even though the blocks were drawn obliquely or isometrically, not in perspective. In that lesson, the students drew "buildings," with most of them drawing flat rectangles. I've been hoping that they would improve after this lesson, but so far most of them haven't.

I'm a bit surprised that they're having trouble drawing cubes. I believe that I could draw an oblique cube in my early elementary years. But then again, I could never draw a person -- my figures weren't exactly stick figures, but they weren't much better. I reckon that there are several students who can draw lifelike human beings yet can't draw a cube. It is the difference between the "left brain" (the more analytic, mathematical side) and the "right brain" (the more artistic side).

12:05 -- Because I know how tough the 80-minute block schedule can be on middle school students, I provide a music break. My student support aide arrives during the music break. I get out my guitar and I play the following inspirational song:

LEARNING TO COMMUNICATE

1st Verse:
Communication
Involves many tools.
There's teaming, journaling,
And sketching in school.
When you draw the shapes,
To look 3D, like a cube.
Just compare it, then
Choose the best from your group.

Refrain:
Learning to communicate
Is what we all must do.
Communication
It's the meaning of life, too!

2nd Verse:
Communication
Not just with your friends.
If you're with someone else
The world won't come to an end.
It will be much better
If you talk to everyone.
Get along with others
Yeah, that's so much fun!

(Repeat Refrain)

12:15 -- At this point, a terrible incident occurs. I choose not to post the full details of the incident here on the blog due to its sensitive nature. To make a long story short, some students start writing a letter in hopes of getting another teacher at the school fired! My only involvement with the incident is that the letter is written during my math class. (My support aide is not sitting in a location where she can tell what the students were writing -- only I see and hear them.)

12:35 -- This is a good time to end the period with an Exit Pass. Students copy the following line:

Today, we drew 3D figures on isometric graph paper.
12:45 -- My eighth grade class goes out to lunch.
1:25 -- My sixth grade class returns for a special "Math Intervention" class. There is special software for this class. I spend much of the period making sure that the students all have the correct password.

The online lesson is on unit rates. This lesson is challenging, since students have to divide to find the unit rates, and many of the numbers they need to divide are multi-digit. No one makes it to the top score of 100, but many students make it to the 90's -- the software starts asking challenge questions once a student reaches 90.

As for the questions involving single-digit numbers, I continue my campaign to stop students from becoming "drens," or reverse-nerds who can't do simple arithmetic. Here's how it works -- this Thursday, the students are scheduled to take a "Dren Quiz" on their 3's times tables. So I draw a multiplication table on the board that goes from 3's to 9's. When the Dren Quiz begins, I'll erase the 3's from the table, so that only the 4's through 9's remain. The table will remain on the board until it's time for them to take their 4's Dren Quiz (probably in December). This way students can have help with the higher times tables but will have to learn them before they're erased.

2:25 -- My sixth graders go out to P.E. class.

3:20 -- All of the middle school teachers plus the fifth grade teacher (at our K-8 school) gather in the classroom of the teacher victimized by the smear letter. We all try to comfort the poor teacher, who is visibly upset.

4:00 -- I go home for the day and head for my computer to type up this blog entry.

Returning to the present, today I just noticed that the website for my old charter school has been updated, and quite a few changes have been made to the teaching staff this year. The most important change is that this year, there is finally a separate science teacher. This means that if I had remained at the school, I'd have had to put up with teaching science for two years before being allowed to teach only math in my third year.

Actually, middle school students still have three main teachers, but with two of the three teachers being math and science, the third teacher is a "Humanities" teacher who apparently covers both English and history. This is more in line with the "Core" classes that my own middle school had back when I was a young student. Since there are only three middle school teachers, there can still be no conference period -- each teacher has one of the three grades at a time.

It makes sense that there would be an actual science teacher this year. After all, this is the year that the California Science Test counts for real. Back then, my main mistake with science was to assume that the projects in the Illinois State "STEM" text (such as "Learning to Communicate" mentioned in the "Day in the Life" above) counted as true science projects. Instead, I probably should have followed my counterpart at the sister charter and only gave projects from the science text. But if I could have made it to my third year and teach only math, only then should I have used the math STEM projects (like "Learning to Communicate" above).

Indeed, an argument could be made that if I was to teach science to only one of the three grades, that grade should have been sixth grade, not eighth grade. After all, the California Science Test given to the eighth graders that year didn't count, while the sixth graders are now currently eighth graders about to take the CAST for real.

My problem was that I was still thinking in terms of the old (pre-NGSS) version of CAST. With the old test, a student could have no science at all in sixth or seventh grades and still earn a perfect score on the CAST since it only tested eighth grade physical science. But the new test covers material from all three years of science. Thus I needed to teach science to all three grades -- but especially sixth grade, since CAST will eventually count for their cohort.

So who is this mysterious new science teacher? It's none other than the history teacher from the year that I taught. Most likely, he added Foundational-Level Science to his history credential, thus allowing him to teach only science this year. I recall that his classroom management was strong, which allows him to teach a new subject with minimal behavior problems. And he's the one who will have to answer the students' complaints of "We never learned this!" when reviewing for the CAST and stumbling upon something they should have learned back in sixth grade with me.

The English teacher -- the victim of the smear campaign from "Day in the Life" above -- is no longer listed as a teacher. Fortunately, she did survive the smears to finish that year and teach one more year at the school before leaving this year. Right around the time I left, she took on a student teacher -- her own student support aide. Both the master and student teachers were listed on the website as English teachers last year, suggesting that he, the student teacher, taught English at the sister charter. Now his name is still listed as a Humanities teacher along with a new name, so I can't be sure whether he's at my old charter or the sister charter.

Who's teaching my subject, math? Well, my successor teacher -- the former kindergarten teacher who just happened to have a math credential -- finished my year and started the next. But a few months ago, her name was dropped from the list and a new teacher took her place -- and it was none other than my old student support aide (also mentioned in "Day in the Life"). I recall that she told our students that math wasn't her strongest subject -- which is why the students should respect and listen to me, not to her. But apparently she became the math and science teacher anyway -- again, her classroom management was very strong (which is why the kids obeyed her, not me), and that more than makes up for her just okay math skills. But now my former aide is no longer listed there -- instead, there is a new math teacher.

Today we return to the blog of Blaugust participant Megan Dubee:

https://www.megandubee.com/single-post/2018/08/30/Writing-Summaries

She writes:

That disappointment aside, we did do our first Desmos AB in class today, and I particularly loved the moment pictured above.

Now I know what "Desmos" is, but not what "AB" is. No, it's not Calculus AB -- a quick search of the Desmos website reveals that it stands for "Activity Builder."

Anyway, recall that for a previous MTBoS challenge (possibly Cardone's), almost every post mentioned Desmos. I've never worked at a school -- either as a teacher or as a sub -- with Desmos software, but note that the calculator for the California version of SBAC is powered by Desmos.

So far, Desmos hasn't appeared in many Blaugust posts -- but, as Dubee points out above, most teachers don't give Desmos lessons too close to the first day of school (setting up accounts). That's why she waited until today to give finally her first Desmos AB.

She continues:

So many of my students are freshmen who haven't used Desmos before, so they were really surprised to find out that I could pace them and anonymize them.

But based on the photo that Dubee posted, the class appears to be Algebra II -- a class in which we don't expect to see many freshmen. (Under Courses near the top of the page, she does mention BC -- and this time I do mean Calculus BC -- so there could indeed be freshmen in Algebra II who are on pace to take Calc BC as seniors.) Even then, I expect rational functions, the topic of this lesson, to be covered in the second semester of Algebra II -- not at the start of the year.

Anyway, the students are supposed to graph a rational function in Desmos, and then write a summary about what they find. I assume that they type this summary directly into Desmos, and then:

I pulled four different statements using Snapshots (love this feature!) for comparison and analysis.

Earlier this week I compared Sarah Giek's manipulatives to Illinois State DIDAX manipulatives since DIDAX was available in my classroom. Similarly, as I reflect on my old class, I couldn't have used Desmos because that wasn't supported in my classroom. Instead, or class used IXL.

So let's compare Megan Dubee's Desmos lesson to my own IXL lesson -- the one that I mentioned at 1:25 in the "Day in the Life" above. The first difference we notice is that I spent much of the time answering my sixth graders' repeated question "What's my IXL password?" -- and recall that this was as late as October. On the other hand, Desmos passwords don't appear to be an issue, not even for Dubee's freshmen at the start of the year.

Sometimes I wonder whether it would have helped to post IXL passwords on the wall. Then students could check their passwords without having to ask me. For some students this might have helped, but I recall there was one boy who didn't know how to type. Sadly, I didn't realize this until just before I left the school -- and so I'd yelled at him so many times about not entering his password correctly.

There was an additional issue with IXL -- my classroom actually didn't have enough laptops for all of the sixth graders. And I never really came up with a good activity for the other students to do.

On this blog, I posted what I should have done about this. Each day during IXL time, I pass out a worksheet for all of the students. The students who have computers can use this worksheet as scratch paper and record only their 0-100 IXL score on the paper. But for those without laptops, I assign them eleven questions (the minimum number of questions needed to earn a 70 on IXL) for them to copy and answer on the worksheet. All eleven questions must be answered correctly -- otherwise they continue to redo them until they are correct.

Which students get the laptops? It could be the best-behaved students, or it could rotate. Those who have trouble typing, such as the boy I mentioned above, might always get the paper assignment.



Wednesday, August 29, 2018

Lesson 1-1: Dots as Points (Day 11)

This is what I wrote last year about today's lesson:

Our focus is now the U of Chicago text. Just like the Serra text, it's an old Second Edition (1991), and there are newer editions in which the chapters are ordered differently. Since my plan this year is to follow the order strictly, let's revisit the chapter order in my text:

Table of Contents
1. Points and Lines
2. Definitions and If-then Statements
3. Angles and Lines
4. Reflections
5. Polygons
6. Transformations and Congruence
7. Triangle Congruence
8. Measurement Formulas
9. Three-Dimensional Figures
10. Surface Areas and Volume
11. Coordinate Geometry
12. Similarity
13. Logic and Indirect Reasoning
14. Trigonometry and Vectors
15. Further Work With Circles

Let's compare this to the modern Third Edition of the U of Chicago text. The first thing we notice is that the new text has only 14 chapters, not 15. We observe that the first twelve chapters are more or less the same in each text, and so it's Chapter 13 that is omitted in the new version. Instead, the material from the old Chapter 13 has been distributed among several different chapters.

You might recall that in the past when I used to juggle the lessons around, it was Chapter 13 that I moved around the most. So you could argue that when I was breaking up Chapter 13, I was actually adhering to the order in the new Third Edition -- unwittingly, of course!

Let's look at Chapter 13 in the old text, and I'll give the lesson in the new text to which the old Chapter 13 material has been moved:

  • Lessons 13-1 through 13-4 (on indirect proof) are now the first three lessons of Chapter 11, just before coordinate proofs. (Lesson 13-2, "Negations," is no longer a separate lesson in the new text.)
  • Lesson 13-5, "Tangents to Circles and Spheres," is now Lesson 14-4, in the circles chapter.
  • Lesson 13-6 through 13-8 (on exterior angles of polygons) have been incorporated into Lessons 5-6 and 5-7 (on Triangle Sum).

Some of these changes are those I once made by myself -- for example, including tangents to circles with the other circle lessons.

Besides the breakup of Chapter 13, here are the other major changes made in the Third Edition:

  • Chapters 4 through 6 exhibit many changes. In my old version, reflections appear in Chapter 4, while the other isometries don't appear until Chapter 6. In the new version, all isometries are defined in Chapter 4. With this, the definition of congruence (and some of its basic properties) have now moved up from Chapter 6 to Chapter 5. Only Triangle Sum remains in Chapter 5 -- the properties of isosceles triangles and quadrilaterals have been pushed back to Chapter 6.
  • With this, Chapter 3 has a few new sections. Two transformations are actually introduced in this chapter, namely rotations and dilations. This may seem strange, since rotations are still defined as Chapter 4 as a composite of reflections in intersecting lines -- and reflections themselves don't appear until Chapter 4. It appears that the purpose of rotations in the new Lesson 3-2 is to introduce rotations informally, as well as tie them more strongly to the angles of Lesson 3-1. (Rotations appear before reflections in Hung-Hsi Wu, but Wu does for different reasons.) Arcs also now appear in Lesson 3-1 instead of having to wait until 8-8. Meanwhile, the new Lesson 3-7 on dilations (which are still called "size transformations") is essentially the old Lesson 12-1 and 12-2. Again this is only an intro -- dilations are still studied in earnest only in Chapter 12.
  • Chapter 7 is basically the same as the old text, especially the first five sections (except that SsA in Lesson 7-5 now has an actual proof). The new Lesson 7-6 is the old Lesson 8-2 on tessellations. I see two new lessons in this chapter, Lesson 7-9 on diagonals of quadrilaterals and Lesson 7-10 on the validity of constructions. (David Joyce would approve of this -- but he'd take it a step forward and not even introduce the constructions until this lesson.) Meanwhile, the old Lesson 7-8 on the SAS Inequality (or "Hinge Theorem") no longer appears in the new text.
  • Chapter 8 has only one new section -- Lesson 8-7, "Special Right Triangles," is the old 14-1. This is so that special right triangles are closely connected to the Pythagorean Theorem.
  • Chapter 9 was always a flimsy chapter in the old book -- it's on 3D figures, yet most of the important info on 3D figures (surface area and volume) don't appear until Chapter 10. Now surface area has moved up to Chapter 9, reserving Chapter 10 for volume (except for the surface area of a sphere, which remains in Chapter 10). The old Lesson 9-8 on the Four-Color Theorem has been dropped, but that was always a lesson that was "just for fun."
  • The last section of the old Chapter 12 (side-splitter) is now the first section of Chapter 13, which is the new trig chapter. Lesson 13-2 is a new lesson on the Angle Bisector Theorem, and Lesson 13-4 is a new lesson on the golden ratio. I've actually seen these ideas used before -- including on the Pappas Mathematical Calendar -- but this is the first time I've seen them in a text as separate lessons. This is followed by lessons on the three trig ratios. Vectors, meanwhile, have moved up to Lesson 4-6, so that they can be closely connected to translations.
  • Chapter 14 should be like the old Chapter 15, but there are a few changes here as well. Ironically, I, like the text, moved tangents to circles to this chapter (Lesson 14-4) so that it would be closer to the other important circle theorem, the Inscribed Angle Theorem. But inscribed angles have been moved up in the new text to Lesson 6-3. This places that lesson closer to the Isosceles Triangle Theorem, which is used in the proof of the theorem. Meanwhile, Lesson 14-6 technically corresponds to 15-4 ("Locating the Center of a Circle") of the old text, but it has been beefed up. Instead of just the circumcenter, it discusses the other three concurrency theorems (important for Common Core) as well as the nine-point circle of a triangle.

Meanwhile, of immediate concern are Chapters 1 and 2 of the new text. Unlike the others, these chapters haven't changed much from the old text. The only difference in Chapter 2 is that Lesson 2-3, on if-then statements in BASIC, has been dropped. (After all, who uses BASIC anymore, except on the Mocha computer emulator for music?) In its place is a new lesson on making conjectures.

Two of the lessons of Chapter 1 have been dropped. One of them is actually today's Lesson 1-1, as its material has been combined with the old Lesson 1-4. Meanwhile, Lesson 1-5, on perspective, has been delayed to Chapter 9 (which makes sense as perspective is definitely related to 3D). The last lesson in Chapter 1 is on technology -- a "dynamic geometry system," or DGS. (That's right -- goodbye BASIC, hello DGS!) Officially, it still corresponds to the last lesson of the old Chapter 1, since this lesson still introduces the Triangle Inequality Postulate (but now students can test out this postulate for themselves on the DGS).

On the blog, I'll continue to follow the old Second Edition of the U of Chicago text. But if I ever get to sub in a classroom again, the classroom has priority over the U of Chicago order. In this case, if an important lesson is skipped, I could sneak the lesson in by following the Third Edition order instead.

Okay, without further ado, let's finally start the U of Chicago text!

Lesson 1-1 of the U of Chicago text is called "Dots as Points." This lesson has the first description of a point:

First description of a point:
A point is a dot.

This is the start of a new school year. Many students enter Geometry having struggled throughout their Algebra I class. Now they come to us in Geometry, and after all the frustration they experienced last year, the first question they ask is, "Why do we have to study Geometry?" Well, the answer is:

A point is a dot.

The old U of Chicago text writes about dot-matrix printers. This isn't relevant to the 21st century, and indeed they don't appear in the modern edition. But here's another question to ask students -- if you didn't have to take math, what would you do at home instead of math homework? And if the answer is "play video games," then guess what -- video game graphics consists of millions of dots. Or, more accurately, they consist of millions of points, since:

A point is a dot.

Images on video games don't come out of nowhere -- someone had to program in the millions of dots, treating them as points -- therefore using Geometry. So without Geometry, video games don't exist. If you want to answer that question -- "What would you do if there was no math?" -- then next time choose something that doesn't require math to build.

In the modern version of the text, there is a brief mention of pixels as part of both computer images and digital camera images. Again, it's not emphasized as much, since "dots as points" must share the new Lesson 1-3 with "network nodes as points."

Here is the Blaugust prompt for today:

A peek into my classroom - show us your classroom or describe a typical day / hour

Well, yesterday I wrote that I don't have any videos of my teaching. And only once did I take any photos of my classroom (not counting photos submitted to Illinois State). For the sake of this Blaugust post, I'll post those pictures again today.

As for a typical hour, I did write about what I originally wanted a typical 80-minute block to look like, about three weeks before the first day of school:

10 minutes: Warm-Up
10 minutes: Go over homework/previous day's lesson
20 minutes: New lesson (Foldable note taking)
10 minutes: Music break
20 minutes: Guided practice
10 minutes: Closure/Exit Pass

This was set up for a traditional lesson. Of course, soon I learned more about the Illinois State text and its nontraditional lessons. Many parts of this 80-minute plan changed -- but I always kept some form of a Warm-Up, music break, and Exit Pass.

Here are the changes to this plan caused by Illinois State. First of all, the Warm-Up turned into the Illinois State Daily Assessment, which is supposed to take only five minutes, not ten. Going over HW and the previous day's lesson were awkward since there was supposed to be only one traditional lesson per week, and the HW was to be done online. Most of the time, I had the students take notes directly into the Student Journals, which was also where the guided practice was. Thus in the end, the typical 80-minute block became:

5 minutes: Warm-Up (Illinois State Daily Assessment)
10 minutes: Review previous week's lesson (from Illinois State)
20 minutes: New lesson (Illinois State Student Journals)
10 minutes: Music break
25 minutes: Guided practice (Illinois State Student Journals)
10 minutes: Closure/Exit Pass

If I remember correctly, the Illinois State pacing guide assigned one hour to the traditional lesson, and notice that the Illinois State parts of this lesson do add up to one hour. The only non-Illinois State parts of this lesson plan are the music break and Exit Pass.

The traditional lesson, as I wrote earlier, would be one day per week. As I realized much too late, the ideal weekly plan would have been something like this:

Monday: Coding (with coding teacher)
Tuesday: Traditional Lesson
Wednesday: Learning Centers
Thursday: Science
Friday: Weekly Assessment

Meanwhile, Shelli -- the leader of the Blaugust challenge -- has her own weekly plan:

http://statteacher.blogspot.com/2018/08/evolutions-in-teaching.html

Even though today is Wednesday, Shelli's post today is all about Multiple Choice Monday. Notice that she doesn't merely ask her students to answer five MC questions. She actually hands her students a worksheet for the students to choose a letter and then reflect on each question -- and it's taken her over three years to develop this worksheet.

Recall that I should have created more worksheets similar to this for more student accountability. In fact, Shelli's weekly plan somewhat fits my own. I could have made the "Monday Five" worksheet into multiple choice (by providing the students with answers choices) and then had them fill out a reflection form while waiting for the coding teacher to arrive. She also mentions a "Terms Tuesday" and "Words Wednesday" for vocabulary practice. This fits the Illinois State curriculum, which encourages teachers to create "word walls" but doesn't explicitly include them in the pacing plan. In any case, I must always be sure to have the proper photocopies when I need them.

Sarah Giek also writes about a typical week in her post today:

https://riseoverrunblog.wordpress.com/2018/08/29/sanity-saving-planning-guide/

Even though Giek teaches high school, her classes are probably the most similar to my old middle school classes from two years ago:

For the first time in my teaching career, I have 4 different classes to prepare for, although most days it feels like 5 because the needs of my ELL students are very different than my non-ELL students.

Two years ago, I had three preps -- and that's part of the reason I was reluctant to delve into science, since my load would have felt more like six preps. Giek continues:

Each course I teach is given a section with 15 rows, with each row representing 5 minutes.

Let's see -- 15 * 5 is 75, so her classes are 75 minutes each. That's not significantly different from my own 80-minute classes.

Giek shows a picture of her lesson-planning spreadsheet, but it's scrolling up so fast that it's difficult to see all the details. I do like how she highlights the cells to indicate whether she has all of the materials for the lesson. That was another reason I was hesitant to teach science -- fear that I wouldn't have all of the materials.

In fact, if I'd had a planning spreadsheet similar to Giek's, then I could have shown it to my staff support aide -- who also could have helped me out more effectively with copies and materials. And moreover, I wonder whether the administrators would have accepted the weekly lesson plans (that we were required to submit) in spreadsheet format.

But here are those pictures from my classroom two years ago to fulfill first part of the Blaugust prompt, followed by the Lesson 1-1 worksheet.







END