Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Attempts to Find Information
3. My Most Important Class
4. What I Could Have Done Better: Math
5. What I Could Have Done Better: Science
6. What I Could Have Done Better: Classroom Management
7. A Day in the Life of My Ideal Seventh Grade Class
8. The Language Barrier
9. The Feynman Point
10. Conclusion
Introduction
This is a strange post, because here I'm going to make a strange announcement. Readers of this blog are aware that I was formerly a middle school teacher at a K-8 charter in Los Angeles. I was only there for less than a year, and since then I've made numerous blog posts about how I could have had a better experience there.
Every five years, charter schools must apply for a renewal of the charter -- the actual document that allows the school to operate. Renewal isn't automatic -- the school must demonstrate to the chartering district -- in this case the LAUSD -- how the school has been successful during the previous five years in order to be granted the renewal.
Anyway, my announcement is that a few months ago, the district denied the charter renewal, mainly for financial reasons. It's possible for the school to appeal to either the county or the state to accept the renewal -- and indeed, I've heard of several charter schools that are currently authorized through LA County or the State of California because their respective districts denied their renewals.
Thus it's possible that my charter school will live on. But all I know as of now is that today -- June 30th, 2019 -- is the day when the charter officially expires. That's why I choose today to post, so I can announce the charter expiration. The "old charter school" that I've mentioned in previous posts is in danger of being an old (as in former, no longer existing)
You might ask, why does the possible closure of my old charter school affect me when I'm no longer a teacher there? Once again, recall that I currently a substitute teacher in search of a full-time job as a regular teacher. Most job applications require prospective teachers to list their former employers along with their contact information.
So I need to know what's going on with my old charter in order for the information on my applications to be current and complete. But while the current students, teachers, and other employers are aware of what's going on, there's no way for that information to reach me. I fear that this will affect my ability to fill out applications and be hired at a school next year.
I'm sorry to mix metaphors here, but this post is "June gloom" and "spilled milk" rolled into one. This post is about all I know about the situation, and what it means for my future as a teacher.
Attempts to Find Information
From time to time, I drive past my old charter school. I often make these visits during weeks of major events -- such as field trips or Pi Day -- and then report it on the blog. But those visits were both before the denial of the renewal petition.
I always knew that the year I taught at the school was the third year of the current five-year charter, and so I was aware that today would be the last day of the charter. But I had always taken it for granted that the charter would be renewed this year, both before and after I left the school.
The school has both Facebook and Twitter pages. But while these were regularly updated during the month before the petition denial, neither has been updated since. I suppose I can't blame the school leaders from being too subdued to want to post anything -- just consider my own posting habits two years ago, right after I left the school. I deleted posts and skipping blogging on many days.
I assume that the school leaders are giving teachers, students, and parents information about the renewal situation face-to-face, or perhaps by sending letters home. But once again, it's frustrating because there's no way for me to access that information.
Indeed, it was just recently that I grew curious about the renewal situation and decided to perform a Google search for my school. I then saw the minutes from the LAUSD board meeting a few months earlier during which the petition was denied. That explained the sudden lack of posts on Facebook and Twitter.
Last week, I decided to visit my school one last time to try to find some information. Of course, by now it's summer vacation and so there are no students there, but I was hoping that some adult affiliated with the school would be there. The back gate was open, and a group of men and boys were playing basketball. But it appears that none of them have anything to do with the school -- they likely live across the street and just played there because the court was accessible. The boys appeared to be upper elementary or middle school students, but they probably attend a nearby public school.
I walked around to the front of the school. There were still signs indicating that students could enroll at the charter school. Yet the front door -- where prospective parents would presumably enter the office to enroll their children -- was locked, and there was no sign of anyone there.
At 2:00, the players left the court. Shortly after, I saw someone enter her car to leave, though it wasn't anyone I recognized from my time at the school. I was hoping that maybe she worked in the office, and thus she would lock the back gate on her way out. That would have indicated that she indeed worked at the school, and so I could ask her about the renewal situation. But she drove off without locking the gate.
Recall that during the year that I worked there, our charter was co-located with a district school. Then the year after I left, the charter moved to its current location -- thus I wasn't familiar with any of the buildings there. I did notice that there was a church very close to the school. So it's possible that the person I saw worked for the church, not the school. If she did work for the school, she was mostly likely a one-woman skeleton crew left behind just to answer the phone until the end of the month.
The signs announcing that students could enroll at the school contained a phone number. So the next day at around noon, I tried calling the number. As it turned out, it was an old landline number from back when the school was still co-located with LAUSD (that is, when I was still there). A tape recorded message announced the school's current numbers, So I called the new number, but there was no answer -- instead, a message directed me to wait until someone picked up the phone. But two minutes later, my call was automatically disconnected.
I tried calling again after hours, hoping for a tape recorded message announcing the current status of the renewal and the availability of student enrollment. Instead, the message announced only that the office was closed (for the day, that is).
I was also provided with the "current" number of our sister campus. But this was even worse -- there was only a message from the phone company that the number was no longer in service.
Therefore after all of this research, I still don't know whether my school will open in the fall or not. I looked back at my job applications to see which phone number I'd provided for previous employer contact info. I'd already known that the numbers from the co-located days were invalid. It turns out that the number I provided is for our sister campus -- a number that I know doesn't work now. But there's no point in switching it to the number for our own campus unless I'm sure that someone will be there to answer the phone.
By now, the only way to find out what's going on -- short of someone actually updating Facebook and Twitter -- is to wait until the fall to see whether the school is open or not. It's possible that another charter might take over the building -- or perhaps the church might even open a private school. It means that this will be a lost summer for my job applications -- prospective employers might raise their eyebrows when they see the invalid phone number on my application.
I will point out that another charter school in the district, upon learning that its own renewal petition was denied, just closed down completely -- the first week in May, shortly after the denial. Thus this school didn't even attempt to appeal to the county or state. When I walked around my old school, I saw, through a window, the date "May 31st" written on a classroom whiteboard. This suggests that my school at least stayed open through the end of May, and probably the end of the school year. So it's likely that my school at least attempted to get a charter renewal with the county or state.
My Most Important Class
Once again, the main reason for the petition denial is financial -- the district did not agree with the charter school leaders regarding how money was spent. But at that fateful board meeting, it was also mentioned that standardized test scores weren't as high as they could have been.
Let me warn you that I'm about to mention race in this post, so if you wish to avoid race or politics, you should stop reading this post now. (But this is a vacation post, and I'll add the "traditionalists" label as I usually do for race-based posts.)
Let's analyze the test scores during the four years of the current charter (since the fifth year state tests, taken a few weeks ago, obviously haven't been scored yet). We see that the scores were highest in the second year -- the year before my arrival -- and have been declining since.
But it's important to look at the breakdown by race. As I wrote on the blog about a year and a half ago, our sister charter is almost 100% African-American, while our own school has both black and Hispanic students. Thus even though the score reports combine the two campuses, we can use "Hispanic" as a proxy for "was taught at our school, not the sister charter."
Furthermore, scores are also broken down by grade level. In five of the six testing grades (3rd-8th), there were ten or fewer Hispanics who took the test, and thus no score is reported. The one class with enough Hispanics to get a report score was in seventh grade during the year I was there.
Thus, of all the scores visible on the report, those for Hispanic seventh grade math are the scores for which I was the most personally responsible. No one else at my school, nor anyone at the sister charter, was more responsible for Hispanic Grade 7 math than I was. And our middle school English teacher had the most control over the Hispanic Grade 7 ELA scores.
The conclusion is inescapable -- during the year I was there, the seventh grade class was by far the most important class I taught. We can argue about whether it's OK to judge students and teachers by test scores, or whether it makes sense to break them down by race, until the cows come home. But the fact of the matter is, I was judged by my Hispanic Grade 7 math scores. And so I should have worked harder to make sure that my Hispanic seventh graders were succeeding.
When that school year first started, it was obvious that there were only two Hispanic students in the eighth grade class, with the rest black. I knew that there were more in the sixth and seventh grade classes, but I didn't count them. Only when it's time for the field trip to the Hidden Figures movie -- a film whose themes include race and gender -- did I actually count the number of students by race.
Not only should I have counted the students by race at the start of the year, but then my focus should have been on either the most diverse class, or the class whose racial majority isn't the same as the whole school's racial majority. Either one of these would have identified seventh grade as the focus class for both our English teacher and me.
It's sometimes tough having three preps, since a teacher must devote time to preparing for each of the different classes. What I'm saying here is that if I had only a limited time to prepare for class and must make a choice between setting up seventh grade and setting up another grade, then I should have chosen seventh grade. And this includes the time I spent on this blog.
You might recall that on the blog, my focus class was eighth grade. I created a "Math 8" label and then described that class more than the others. I did so because this is a Common Core Geometry blog, and Grade 8 is a key year for the geometry (G) standards under the Core. But once again, my needs in the classroom should have taken precedence. If it made more sense for me to focus on seventh grade, then I should have created the "Math 7" label instead.
Indeed, there were so few eighth graders that, even though they were more than ten, just enough were absent on testing day for them not to receive a math score in the report -- enough were present for ELA, but not math. This meant that seventh grade turned out to be even more important for me than for the English teacher (but there was no way to know this at the time).
Then again, the English teacher was better set up for seventh grade success than I was. Of the three grades, seventh was the grade I saw the least. Both sixth and eighth grades saw me for IXL after lunch, but not seventh grade. On Wednesdays, they didn't have me at all. Even when IXL time was replaced with SBAC Prep, I saw the sixth graders for an hour, but seventh grade for only half an hour.
In the end -- and I mentioned this a year and a half ago on the blog -- the ELA scores for Hispanic seventh graders in my year were much better than their math scores. So our English teacher had something she could be proud of in the score report, but not me.
As teachers, we should care about our students' needs, not my needs or the school's needs. But the truth is, if I'm no longer an employee at the school, or if the school is shut down, then there's no way for me to help students learn and satisfy their needs. Thus what I needed to think about the whole time I was there is keeping my job and keeping the school open -- and the way to accomplish both was to focus on Hispanic seventh grade math SBAC scores.
In this post, I wish to write only about those factors I had control over. I had no control over the bell schedule and the fact that seventh grade had much more time in English than in math. And I had no control over how the school leaders spent money (that is, I could have raised every single student's math score by one full level and they might have nonetheless closed the school over finances). The goal in this post is to describe what I could have done to improve the situation. What could I have done to improve Hispanic seventh grade math scores? What could I have done so that I wouldn't have needed to leave my job? What could I have done to get the renewal petition renewed?
What I Could Have Done Better: Math
In many previous posts, I described two weekly plans with regards to how to schedule all parts of the Illinois State project-based curriculum. Both take into account that the coding teacher visited my classroom every Monday:
Plan I:
Monday: Coding Monday
Tuesday: STEM Project
Wednesday: Traditional Lesson
Thursday: Learning Centers
Friday: Weekly Assessment
Plan II:
Monday: Coding Monday
Tuesday: Traditional Lesson
Wednesday: Learning Centers
Thursday: STEM Project
Friday: Weekly Assessment
The first plan is the one suggested by Illinois State itself. But this one is not suitable for seventh grade, because there was no class on Wednesdays for the traditional lesson -- and the students wouldn't have been able to do any projects without getting the traditional lesson. The second plan was created with the seventh grade schedule in mind. Under this plan, seventh graders would miss Learning Centers, which sixth and eighth graders would get. Yet, as you'll see later in this post, there might have been a way for seventh grade to get Learning Centers anyway -- at least sometimes.
Illinois State recommends that one standard be taught each week. If we look at the Common Core Math 7 standards, we see the following schedule:
Weeks 1-6: RP (1, 2abcd, 3)
Weeks 7-15: NS (1abcd, 2abcd, 3)
Weeks 16-20: EE (1, 2, 3, 4ab)
Weeks 21-26: G (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
Weeks 27-37: SP (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7ab, 8abc)
In reality, there's no way we could get through all of the SP (stats & prob) standards, but we should at least start them before the SBAC. My rule of thumb is to assume ten solid weeks of teaching during each trimester. This means that second trimester starts with NS2 (number sense, mostly integer ops), and the third trimester starts with G (geometry).
Notice that the first Tuesday of the third trimester that year was Pi Day. Technically, pi is taught as part of Standard G4, but the third trimester starts with G1. In this case, it isn't too bad to start with G4 instead, so that the students could have had a happy Pi Day. Once again, recall from the blog that even though I was no longer teaching at the school by Pi Day, I did buy my old class a pizza. It turned out to be for sixth graders, only because their class was the one that met before lunch (and after the pizza place opened) due to the special Parent Conferences schedule at the start of the trimester.
What I Could Have Done Better: Science
I mentioned recently (after subbing for a seventh grade science class) that my seventh graders really drew the short end of the stick when it came to science. I didn't teach much science at all to any of the three grades -- and now we combine that with the lack of class time I had with seventh grade.
I've devoted many posts to how I could have taught science better. I explained that the three-week cycles that I'd envisioned for math tests actually should have applied to science instead.
In fact, notice that there were actually four types of assessments that I wanted to give my students -- Dren Quizzes, (math) Regular Quizzes, (math) tests, and science tests. Thus, if there was to be any sort of cycle, it should be four weeks, not three.
In fact, let's divide up the entire year into four-week cycles, as follows:
Weeks 1-4: Science Unit 1
Weeks 5-8: Science Unit 2
Weeks 9-12: Science Unit 3
Week 13: End of Trimester 1
Weeks 14-17: Science Unit 4
Weeks 18-21: Science Unit 5
Weeks 22-25: Science Unit 6
Week 26: End of Trimester 2
Weeks 27-30: Science Unit 7
Weeks 31-34: Science Unit 8
Weeks 35-38: Science Unit 9
These weeks don't really line up with the weeks I listed for math standards above, since this now shows the entire year, including special weeks when there might not be time for a math standard.
Now within each unit, the four assessments are given in the following order:
First Week: Dren Quiz
Second Week: Math Quiz
Third Week: Science Test
Fourth Week: Math Test
Science is to be taught on Thursdays. This means that the "STEM project" listed above will usually be a science project. In fact, the idea is to have traditional lessons during the first and third weeks of each cycle, and projects during the second and fourth weeks. This allows me to fulfill the Illinois State requirement of submitting feedback from science projects every two weeks.
Most assessments are given on Fridays. This includes the science test, which is given after the traditional lesson on Thursday.
There are many special weeks where this pattern isn't used -- but even during special weeks, we try to follow this pattern as closely as possible. During the first week of school, the traditional science lesson is on science safety, and the Dren Quiz is on 10's. The second week of school, we give the mousetrap project to all grades (the first project of the year and the only one that's not science), and that week's Benchmark Tests take the place of the Math Quiz (and is given earlier that week). The third week of school, the science test on Thursday is actually the Study Island pretest. (There was no school on Friday due to the four-day Labor Day weekend.) Then the first test that actually counts in student grades is the Math Test the fourth week, which covers the earliest math standards (mostly RP1, with possibly some RP2a). The first real science project is also given the fourth week.
The fifth week starts Unit 2 -- the first real science unit. A short traditional lesson can be given on Thursday, followed immediately by the Dren Quiz on 2's. This is because the field trip to the LA County Fair is on Friday (where a real science lesson -- observing farm animals -- can occur).
Now what science would I teach the seventh graders that year? I wrote in earlier posts that we should consider seventh grade to be the last cohort using the old California Standards (with life science in seventh grade and physical science in eighth), with that year's sixth graders to be the first cohort using the Preferred Integrated curriculum of the NGSS.
Thus seventh graders get life science. I use the online version of the Illinois State science text and then simply cover all of the projects in the order they are given. The traditional lessons and assessments thus correspond to the projects that I'm giving. (I wish I still had access to that online text so that I can post what these fascinating lessons actually are.)
There's no real reason for me to number the units here, except to note that the Dren Quiz that I give during each unit matches the unit number (except that I give the 10's Dren Quiz during Unit 1). The unit numbers are actually more significant for sixth grade, where I teach the Preferred Integrated model, following not the Illinois State order, but rather the Study Island order. That curriculum actually does number the units (with Unit 1 indeed being the pretest as stated above).
What I Could Have Done Better: Classroom Management
Of course, many of my biggest problems that year involve classroom management. Here I will discuss some of the things I could have done to manage the classroom much better than I actually did.
Recall that my class had a support aide -- and a huge problem was that many of the students respected her much more than they respected me. So we can look at what my schedule was that year and the times when the aide was available. Then we can figure out how I could have stepped up my management game during the times when she wasn't there.
Since seventh grade had coding on Mondays and music on Wednesdays, the three days that are significant to management are Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday. On Tuesdays and Fridays, seventh grade was the second class of the day, and my aide had usually arrived by then. But on Thursdays, seventh grade met before my aide arrived. Thus I especially needed to be careful about classroom management on Thursday mornings.
I've explained in previous posts why my management went awry that year. One problem was that I entered the classroom expecting my students not to listen to me, and so I avoided telling them to do things as much as possible. For example, I knew that students would not want to sit in their assigned seats and try to move next to their friends. Thus I wanted to let them choose their own assigned seats until I at least knew their names. Once I learned their names, then I could move them, since now I could catch anyone who tried to switch seats.
Anyway, the history teacher -- who had taught these students as sixth graders the previous year -- informed me of the four boys who were likely to cause trouble. Since I'm discussing race in this post, I'll mention that of this quartet, two were Latino and two were black. The history teacher then recommended that I seat these students in four corners of the room, so that they would be separated as far as possible. But I didn't, since I'd already planned on letting the students choose their seats.
This, of course, was the beginning of all my troubles. The four guys were loud and tried to take over the class. The other seventh graders saw them and decided that they had the right to be loud too. And then the sixth and eighth graders heard my seventh graders when they were in English room -- and they decided that they had the right to be loud in my classroom too.
Instead, I should have followed my colleague's advice and seated the four boys in the corners. It's likely that if I did so, one of them would have made a snide remark such as, "Hey, this is the same as the history class. Can't you come up with an original seating chart?" My response should have been something like "No, I can't." If I haven't learned all the students' names yet, I should at least learn the names of the four corner students first, so that I can catch them when they inevitably try to switch to a different seat.
This should have been my general approach to classroom management. Sometimes that year, I felt as if I was more afraid of snide remarks than of bad behavior -- if I told a student to stop misbehaving, they'd reply that I was mean or unfair, or simply "I wasn't talking." Instead, I should just ignore such remarks if I know that I'm right.
Instead of avoiding telling students not to do things that they might find unpleasant, I should intentionally tell them to do so -- but sure I know in advance what to do if they don't obey me.
For example, I considered using some sort of binder or interactive notebook system. This would have helped the students immensely as they tried to learn math and science. But I was afraid that many students would refuse to purchase the notebooks, or buy them and then forget to bring them more than half the time.
As small as my classes were, I can buy enough notebooks for all the students. Then I can come up with punishments for students who don't bring them -- this includes a parent phone call for those who go multiple days without bringing a notebook, and perhaps lesser punishments for those who go one or two days without a notebook.
Then to get the class quiet, I tell the students, "Open your notebooks and close your mouths." This is to establish a routine -- when the lesson begins, it's time to stop talking.
One major problem I had with the seventh grade was that when there were only a few kids talking (such as the four troublemakers), I didn't saying anything. I was still thinking like a sub -- if I'm subbing and there are only four students talking, I considered it a miracle!
But as a regular teacher, when I let four students talk and only confronted students when there were more talking, the newer students genuinely thought that I was being unfair. I still remember two black girls who thought I was being sexist when I told them to stop talking -- because I had let the four guys talk throughout the class period. One of these girls had received the top score on the Benchmark Tests at the start of the year, but she no longer respected me because of this incident. Her grades dropped the whole time that I was in that classroom.
There's one more thing I could have done with this group of seventh graders. At the end of the Benchmark Tests at the start of the year, I introduced a game of "Fraction Fever." My plan was that this game was something to play after Benchmarks, and so I didn't play it again until November, at the end of the first trimester.
What I didn't expect was how much the seventh graders in particular enjoyed Fraction Fever -- both the song and the game. When I saw this, I should have found a way to use the Fraction Fever song and game to my advantage.
On Wednesday afternoons, there was often extra time left between music class and lunch. This would have been a good time to play the Fraction Fever song. The class is divided into two groups, and if one group gets in trouble, I just drop that group one level in the game. And the next day -- which as you might notice, is Thursday morning, the key day (since both my aide hasn't arrived yet, and it's the science day) -- I make the class be quiet before handing out Fraction Fever prizes. This helps me out with classroom management on those critical Thursday mornings.
This is how effective classroom managers do what they do -- they look for something that works and then do it. I instead, did the opposite -- I made plans (for both the seating chart and Fraction Fever) and stuck to them no matter what. If I had been more adaptable, I could have taken advantage of what I had, and ended up with a better class.
Incidentally, once I move the four boys to the four corners, I should monitor their behavior. Chances are two of them will improve their behavior once the four are separated. I should figure out which two improve the most by, say, the end of the first trimester, and reward them by allowing them to sit with each other.
A Day in the Life of My Ideal Seventh Grade Class
I wish to describe what my ideal seventh grade class might have looked like if I had followed the principles mentioned earlier in this post (as well as the resolutions mentioned in other posts).
Let's start with a randomly chosen day from my seventh grade class that year -- January 10th. This was a Tuesday and the first day after winter break. As it turned out, this was one of my best days in the seventh grade class -- but by observing these principles, I could have made the class even better.
I wrote about that day on the blog, under the title "A California 'Snow' Day" (referring to the rain we had that day). Let's keep the "A Day in the Life" format and I'll describe what the ideal seventh grade class might have looked like.
9:45 -- This class officially starts at 9:45. But this is actually when the previous class of sixth graders leaves my classroom -- there are no bells and hence no official "passing period."
But if I'm an effective manager who enforces rules, there's nothing wrong with unofficially observing a five-minute passing period here. After five minutes, I can start enforcing rules -- most notably "no food in the classroom," since so many students want to eat between their English and math classes.
9:50 -- It's time for the Warm-Up. I'm required to give the Illinois State Daily Assessment, which is usually a quick review of the previous day's lesson. But this is the first day after a long vacation, and so no matter what problem I give, some students won't remember how to do it.
But in this class, the students have interactive notebooks. So I go up and down the rows and look for students who aren't doing the work, and ask them why. If they say "I don't remember how to do this," then I tell them which page of their notebook will be the most helpful.
9:55 -- One of my resolutions is for the Warm-Ups not to take too long. Illinois State recommends for the Warm-Up to take only five minutes. After five minutes, I go and stamp Warm-Up papers. I tell the students that they should be taking out their notebooks.
10:00 -- Since it's Tuesday, it's now time for the traditional lesson. As I wrote earlier in this post, I say "Notebooks open, mouths closed."
On the actual January 10th that year, my lesson was on angles (G5). But if we follow the pacing guide listed above, this week would probably be NS2d or NS3. But for the sake of this post, let's assume that I'm teaching G5 anyway, since I want to make a direct comparison to January 10th in the original (real) timeline.
There was only one real problem that I had on the real January 10th -- many students had trouble figuring out how to use the protractors. But by following the principles mentioned in this post, I could improve upon this lesson.
First of all, with interactive notebooks, I pass out worksheets for students to paste in the notebooks -- and these worksheets show angles for the kids to measure. And second, the line "Notebooks open, mouths closed" means that students should be quiet, so they are paying attention when I tell them how to use the protractors.
It's the second trimester, so by now two of the four troublemakers have been reformed. I remember that on the first day after winter break, one of the them (a black guy) tells me that he and his sister are transferring to another school. He wants to play competitive middle school sports, which our school doesn't offer. (Ironically, one of the things I do know about my old charter school in 2019 is that now our school does have sports teams. This, of course, was before the denial of the renewal petition.)
Let's assume that the two Latino boys are the ones still sitting in the corners. I remember that around this time in the original (real) timeline, one of their fathers requested that I indeed sit his son in the corner so that the kid can learn and be focused.
By the way, for the sake of my Hispanic students, I might try to help any English learners by defining words like "protractor," "acute," and so on in the notes. I actually don't believe that there were many English learners in the class. (Recall how well this cohort goes on to fare on the SBAC for ELA.)
10:25 -- It's time for music break -- but on this day, I have a very special music break. On this day, I sing Square One TV's "Angle Dance," since it fits the lesson perfectly. But in this song, the students should participate. It's based on an activity called "Human Protractor," which I learned about the previous day during a PD day -- "Responsible Classroom" training. (This is why the first day after winter break was Tuesday, since Monday was this PD day.)
On the actual January 10th, I was afraid that many students would refuse to do the Human Protractor, and just stay seated -- or stand yet do nothing. But the Human Protractor is an activity that would really help the students to learn the angles. Thus I should require students to participate.
Thus I threaten to punish students who aren't moving their arms for the angles. Since my aide should be in the classroom, she can help check to see who isn't participating. This is a proper use for my support aide -- she should help me with management, not be the main manager.
10:35 -- Only now should I have the students work in the "Student Journals" (which are Illinois State consumable texts). On the actual January 10th, I made the "Student Journals" the whole lesson, but now the students have notebooks to refer to for help.
11:00 -- During the last five minutes, I give an Exit Pass. I mentioned in old posts that Pappas-style questions where the answer is the date should be the Exit Pass, not the Warm-Up (which should be the Illinois State Daily Assessment).
On the original January 10th, I had the students answer a New Year's problem, "2 + 0 + 1 + 7 =." This is also based on another idea I've seen on the web -- make an entire activity where students do the "four 4's" problem but for the digits of the date, and give this activity on the first day after returning from winter break.
If I give this exit pass, I should make the students show work. If this were a typical problem (for example, draw a 10-degree angle) then there's no need to show work, but here I might require the students to write "Happy New Year!" to keep them in the habit of always showing their work on the Exit Passes.
11:05 -- The seventh graders leave after a fruitful 75 minutes of learning.
The Language Barrier
My goal in this post is to present an environment in which all my students can learn -- but especially the Hispanic students. One challenge in teaching Hispanic students is, of course, the language barrier.
Recently when I was subbing, I tried to tell a Latino boy to put his phone away. Instead, he started speaking Spanish and pretending that he couldn't understand me. But I believe that he was speaking English earlier in class, and so it was all just an act to avoid obeying my instructions.
Therefore I suspect that learning a few commands in Spanish won't help me get through to students such as these. He'd probably just act as if I wasn't pronouncing the Spanish properly -- I didn't roll my r's, so he still can't understand me. A student who really wants to follow directions would figure out what I'm saying (for example, asking another kid to translate) and just do so. A student who is determined to misbehave will find any excuse not to listen to me, regardless of his race. In this case, he just takes advantage of his race to pretend that he can't understand English.
Once again, when I was at the old charter school, most of the Hispanic seventh graders spoke English, and none of them tried to pretend that they didn't understand me. But when some students misbehaved and I threatened to call their parents, the kids told me that their parents didn't speak English, and so there was no point in calling home. The implication was that I might as well let the Hispanic students do whatever they wanted, since there was no way to contact their parents. Thus once again, students took advantage of the language barrier to disobey me.
This underlies a reason why I need to have a level of punishment between the initial warning and the parent phone call. There must be a way to punish students and redirect them to better behavior that doesn't involve any adult other than myself.
Once again, I should be able to use the seating chart as punishment. If two students are being disruptive, then I should separate them.
One of the worst-behaved students in the class was the Latino boy whose parents I never spoke to. I suspect that his parents speak no English, and thus calling his home was useless. But he had one weakness that I knew of -- he had a girlfriend, a girl in the class.
Thus I should have taken advantage of this fact. He should be seated in the corner -- definitely separated from his girlfriend. If he tries to switch seats to sit next to her, then I go ahead and punish both of them. Unlike his parents, her parents might speak English and be more responsive, so she might tell her boyfriend to return to his seat so she can avoid trouble. And the girlfriend should be surrounded by good students who don't want to break rules. Then most of the time, there isn't even an available seat for the boyfriend.
I wrote that the Angle Dance song engaged many students in the class -- the black girls. At the time, I wanted to engage this group because they were the target demographic of Hidden Figures, the upcoming movie field trip. I don't remember how many Hispanic students were engaged by the song.
I recall one Latino boy who wanted me to give an intro in Spanish to one of my songs -- open up with "uno, dos, tres, cuatro." I knew that there was one Square One TV song to which this line fits well -- "Sign of the Times," a song about multiplication. This song has a Latin beat and contains a line repeated in English and Spanish:
X, it's the sign of the times.
Equis es el simbolo de los tiempos.
I was thinking of singing this song and saving it for a very special day -- Cinco de Mayo. The problem, of course, is that I left my school and never made it to Pi Day, much less Cinco de Mayo.
I shouldn't wait until May to engage my Hispanic students. Since one guy wanted me to add some Spanish to my songs, I should have obliged much earlier. And as the song is about multiplication, the song fits best just before a Dren Quiz. I believe that the first Dren Quiz after this boy asked me to sing in Spanish was the 4's (as he transferred to our school just days before the 3's Dren Quiz), and so I should sing the song before the 4's quiz.
Notice that according to the schedule listed above, the 4's Dren Quiz should be Week 14. This is the first week of the second trimester and hence was Parent Conference week. Ordinarily I don't sing songs on minimum days such as Parent Conference days, but it's worth it to make an exception.
The Feynman Point
Two days ago was Tau Day. My tradition on the blog is to use tau, rather than pi, to solve problems involving circles -- from now until Pi Approximation Day.
Yet I mentioned pi and Pi Day several times in today's post. This is because I was referring to an actual seventh grade class -- and seventh graders learn about pi, not tau. I suppose I could have written "Half Tau Day" instead of "Pi Day" throughout this post, but that would have distracted readers from the points I was making about the seventh grade class.
There's one thing related to math and science that I actually did two days ago, on Tau Day. I was in a local comic book store, but there was one new comic book -- a graphic novel, actually -- that I found very unusual. The book is called Hawking -- as in Stephen Hawking (the subject of A Theory of Everything) -- and its author is Jim Ottaviani. He's also listed on the book as the author of another graphic novel, Feynman.
It turns out that Ottaviani has written several graphic novels about famous scientists -- and in fact, his first novel Feynman was published in 2011.
I didn't mention this at all in my Tau Day post, because I didn't think I'd be able to find it at my library this quickly. But the next day, yesterday, I had checked out a copy of Feynman.
This is our summer reading book -- you can consider this to be side-along reading if you wish. In my next post, I'll read and describe the first part of the book. For now, let me quote the front jacket:
"Richard O. Feynman (1918-1988) was one of the great minds -- and great personalities -- of the twentieth century. A Nobel-Prize winning physicist, he was also a safecracker, an adventurer, and a world-class raconteur.
"Feynman lived his life large and loud, becoming a public favorite with his autobiographical collections Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! and What Do You Care What Other People Think? His innovations in the field of quantum electrodynamics profoundly changed the way we think about things as simple -- or complex -- as matter and light. He played a crucial role in uncovering the cause of the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster. His work on the Manhattan Project contributed to the creation of the atomic bomb, changing the course of world history.
"And he was really, really fun at parties."
The Feynman point of pi is named after Richard Feynman (although one of the first physicists fascinated with it was actually our last side-along author, Douglas Hofstadter). It refers to the six consecutive nines among the digits of pi, starting at the 762nd decimal place:
3.1415926535...1499999983...
Notice that tau must also have a Feynman point. If we imagine doubling the above number, we get:
6.2831853071...2999999967...
Doubling the 8 causes a carry in the next digit, forcing it to be odd, and then each of the 9's cause carries when doubling, so all of them remain 9's. The leftmost 9 causes a carrying when doubling, and this forces the 4, when doubled, to become 9 as well. Thus the Feynman point of tau contains seven 9's, one more than pi.
If we double this number again to 2tau = 4pi:
12.5663706143...5999999934...
this number again has seven 9's. But after one last doubling to 4tau = 8pi:
25.1327412287...1999999869...
then this number returns to having only six 9's, since the 3 after the last 9 doesn't cause a carry.
This year on Pi Day (uh, Half Tau Day), the students created a long colored chain based on the digits of pi. It's possible that it was long enough to have reached the Feynman point, but I don't know.
Returning to Ottaviani's book, I like the idea of depicting scientists as heroes, because they are. My students need to see that mathematicians and scientists are heroes, not nerds, and so they should strive to do well in my math and science classes. This includes my old Hispanic seventh graders (who by now have just completed their freshman year of high school).
Conclusion
Well, I don't know what to say. I'll continue to drive past my old charter school -- and perhaps even our sister school -- for any hints of what's happening in the fall. For the sake of my former coworkers, I hope that the school is able to get its charter renewed, whether at the district, county, or state level.
I'm glad that at least all of the middle school students that I taught have completed their time at the charter school. Thus none of them are affected by the current chaos. But unfortunately, I'm still definitely affected by the situation and how it will affect my job applications -- so I make make my return to full-time teaching.
No comments:
Post a Comment